Irma makes landfall again in Florida as Category 3 storm on Marco Island

DEVELOPING: Hurricane Irma made landfall on Marco Island Sunday afternoon — its second landfall in Florida as the state continues to brace for the now-Category 3 storm’s strong, 115-mph winds and flooding.

In its 2 p.m. ET advisory, the National Hurricane Center said the storm was located about 35 miles south-southeast of Naples, with sustained winds of 120 miles per hour, and headed north at 12 mph.

tracker_1230pmm

The nearly 400-mile-wide storm made landfall at Cudjoe Key in the lower Florida Keys at 9:10 am ET, the NHC said.  A 92 mph wind gust was recently reported at the Federal Aviation Administration station at Miami International Airport.

“Pray, pray for everybody in Florida,” Gov. Rick Scott said on “Fox News Sunday.”

The latest forecasts project Irma will hug Florida’s western coast off Fort Myers through the day Sunday, with the eye wall reaching the Tampa Bay area by the end of the day. At least 28 people have died as Hurricane Irma ravaged the Caribbean this week, destroying buildings and uprooting trees on its path toward Florida.

“We know we are ground zero for this storm,” Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn said at a news conference announcing a curfew that will take effect at 6 p.m. Sunday. “We have avoided it for 90 years, but our time has come to be ready.”

“Depending on the exact track of Irma, locations in the hurricane warning areas could see devastating to catastrophic impacts, including structural damage and widespread power and communication outages from high winds.”

– Fox News Senior Meteorologist Janice Dean

Irma’s wind field is large, with hurricane-force winds extending outward up to 80 miles from the center, and tropical-storm-force winds extend outward up to 220 miles, according to Fox News Senior Meteorologist Janice Dean. Those hurricane-force winds will expand eastward across the entire peninsula.

“Depending on the exact track of Irma, locations in the hurricane warning areas could see devastating to catastrophic impacts, including structural damage and widespread power and communication outages from high winds,” Dean said. “The National Weather Service said that areas in the hurricane warning could be uninhabitable for weeks or months.”

“It is important to remember not to just focus on the forecast cone, as it does not take into account the large size of Irma, with dangerous impacts expected outside of the path of the center,” Dean added.

Irma was at one time the most powerful hurricane ever recorded in the open Atlantic, with a peak wind speed of 185 mph last week. This marks the first year on record the continental U.S. has had two Category 4 hurricane landfalls in the same year.

The first hurricane-force winds arrived in the Florida Keys shortly before 11 p.m. ET Saturday, bending palm trees and spitting rain as the storm swirled north. There will be a tornado threat across Florida for the next 36 hours, according to Fox News Chief Meteorologist Rick Reichmuth.

In Palm Bay, Florida, located about 74 miles southeast of Orlando, police said six mobile homes were destroyed by a tornado, but no injuries were reported.

More: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/10/irma-makes-landfall-again-in-florida-as-category-3-storm-on-marco-island.html

……………………………

……………………….

Why Hurricanes Irma & Harvey are So Powerful it’s Cosmic Rays not CO2

With Hurricane Irma bearing down on the west coast of Florida with 140 mph winds, and last week Hurricane Harvey drowning Texas, there is much talk of CO2 causing the weather intensity changes. Why is it that longer term cycles, cosmic rays and the grand solar minimum are not discussed as causes in intensification for the changes globally we are seeing. I present my findings that cosmic rays are causing the extreme weather we are seeing and a timeline for more intensification based on feedback loops of more cloud cover due to a weakened magnetosphere allowing cosmic rays to form more clouds between 15,000-18,500 ft in the Earth’s atmosphere.

……………………

A useful retort for those claiming #Irma & #Harvey hurricanes are a sure sign of ‘climate change’

History can be a pesky thing, facts are stubborn things. There’s lot’s of caterwauling in the left about hurricane Irma on the heels of Harvey, being a sure sign of ‘climate change’ or global warming, or ‘climate disruption’ or something. A couple of days ago, king of the alarmists, Dr. Michael Mann, and his ex NCDC/NCEI toadie Dr. Thomas Peterson (architect of the Karlization of the global temperature record),  penned a ridiculous op-ed in the Washinton Post:

Only in the mind of Mann can such drivel be produced. Mann is not a hurricane expert, he’s also apparently not a scholar of history.

Dr. Philip Klotzbach is both:

So the question for Mann et al. is: what drove those major hurricanes to be so close together in 1933? Surely if that happened today, it would be used to “kill any doubt” Right?

And what about the fact that Irma and Harvey have come in 7th and 18th compared to storms of that era, hmmm?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Ref.: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/09/10/a-useful-retort-for-those-claiming-irma-harvey-hurricanes-are-a-sure-sign-of-climate-change/

Support

Newscats – on Patreon or Payoneer ID: 55968469

Cherry May Timbol – Independent Reporter
Contact Cherry at: cherrymtimbol@newscats.org or timbolcherrymay@gmail.com
Support Cherry May directly at: https://www.patreon.com/cherrymtimbol

Ad

Why do CO2 lag behind temperature?

71% of the earth is covered by ocean, water is a 1000 times denser than air and the mass of the oceans are 360 times that of the atmosphere, small temperature changes in the oceans doesn’t only modulate air temperature, but it also affect the CO2 level according to Henry’s Law.

The reason it is called “Law” is because it has been “proven”!

“.. scientific laws describe phenomena that the scientific community has found to be provably true ..”

That means, the graph proves CO2 do not control temperature, that again proves (Man Made) Global Warming, now called “Climate Change” due to lack of … Warming is – again – debunked!