Does Anthropogenic Accumulation Make Sense?

By Alan Siddons

The US Department of Energy’s Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) says that mankind is responsible for the increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide since the year 1850.

Let’s examine the key quote by the authoritative U.S. government agency:

Anthropogenic CO comes from fossil fuel combustion, changes in land use (e.g., forest clearing), and cement manufacture. Houghton and Hackler have estimated land-use changes from 1850-2000, so it is convenient to use 1850 as our starting point for the following discussion. Atmospheric CO concentrations had not changed appreciably over the preceding 850 years (IPCC; The Scientific Basis) so it may be safely assumed that they would not have changed appreciably in the 150 years from 1850 to 2000 in the absence of human intervention.”

What the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) is saying here is that mankind is principally or wholly responsible for the increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide since the year 1850. Taken from their data, this is a year by year chart of atmospheric carbon change compared to human carbon emissions between 1850 and 2000.

That puddle at the bottom of the chart is thought to be responsible for the magnitude that looms above it by means of accumulation, i.e., piling up every year due to its prolonged life in the atmosphere. Indeed, if we accumulate each annual human quantity we get a chart that looks like this.

This reverses the proportions to a large extent. In agreement with the CDIAC that “about 40%” has remained in the atmosphere, this chart depicts a 42% remainder (approximately 181/431), meaning that 58% is no longer floating around.

Read the full article at:

http://tech-know-group.com/essays/Does_Anthropogenic_Accumulation_make_sense.pdf

“Contrary to what you read in the newspaper, the sinks of CO2 are not
decreasing. On the contrary they are increasing as fast as the CO2
emissions have increased.” – James Hansen et al
Ref.: https://principia-scientific.org/does-anthropogenic-accumulation-make-sense/

Support

Newscats – on Patreon or Payoneer ID: 55968469

Cherry May Timbol – Independent Reporter
Contact Cherry at: cherrymtimbol@newscats.org or timbolcherrymay@gmail.com
Support Cherry May directly at: https://www.patreon.com/cherrymtimbol

Ad

Why do CO2 lag behind temperature?

71% of the earth is covered by ocean, water is a 1000 times denser than air and the mass of the oceans are 360 times that of the atmosphere, small temperature changes in the oceans doesn’t only modulate air temperature, but it also affect the CO2 level according to Henry’s Law.

The reason it is called “Law” is because it has been “proven”!

“.. scientific laws describe phenomena that the scientific community has found to be provably true ..”

That means, the graph proves CO2 do not control temperature, that again proves (Man Made) Global Warming, now called “Climate Change” due to lack of … Warming is – again – debunked!