What’s That Got To Do With A Russia Probe?

By Andrew Bolt ~

Finally a judge questions the “unfettered power” Robert Mueller has assumed to persecute people over issues nothing to do with his actual brief – to investigate Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia.

Senior United States District Judge T.S. Ellis III has been assigned one of the pending criminal cases … brought by the Special Counsel Robert Mueller (pictured) against Paul Manafort. In a hearing on the motion brought by Manafort to dismiss the charges as beyond the authority of the Special Counsel, Judge Ellis unloaded…

The case before Judge Ellis consists of tax and bank fraud charges that not only have nothing to do with alleged Russian collusion, but also predate the 2016 presidential campaign by a decade…

“I don’t see what relationship this indictment has with anything the special counsel is authorized to investigate,” Judge Ellis said. He decried Mueller’s apparently “unfettered power.” He did not find the power to prosecute Mueller in the May 2017 appointment order, which directed him to pursue links between Russia and the Trump campaign, as well as “any matter that arose or may arise directly” from the investigation. He said that Mueller improperly took over existing Justice Department investigations into Manafort without adequately explaining what connection it had to the Russia probe…

Judge Ellis doesn’t find [an authority to investigate such matters] in the May 2017 memo by Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein. Team Mueller was represented at the hearing by former deputy solicitor general Michael Dreeben. At the hearing Dreeben took a drubbing. Asserting that Mueller’s authority is even broader than the mandate given 2017 memo, Dreeben claimed that national security precluded a full accounting of Mueller’s authority.

Dreeben cited Rosenstein’s August 2017 memo — covered by Andrew McCarthy in this NR column — explicitly granting Mueller the authority to investigate Manafort’s Ukraine dealings years before the 2016 election.

Mueller must have given Judge Ellis the same highly redacted copy of the August 2017 memo that is linked above. Judge Ellis wanted to see the whole thing. He gave Mueller two weeks to consult with intelligence agencies to determine whether they can confide a sealed, unredacted version of the memo with him.

Dreeben told him the redacted portions did not pertain to the Manafort case. “I’ll be the judge,” Ellis said.

CNN quotes Judge Ellis: “You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort’s bank fraud.” Judge Ellis demonstrated his grasp of what I’ve been calling the Mueller Switch Project. He said prosecutors were interested in Manafort only because of his potential to provide material that would lead to President Trump’s “prosecution or impeachment.”

In other words, it’s a kind of blackmail.

Ref.: https://papundits.wordpress.com/2018/05/06/whats-that-got-to-do-with-a-russia-probe/

…..

I did not realize until I read the full transcript of Friday’s court hearing how badly it went for the Mueller team, which was reduced to arguing: yeah, we violated the regulations governing special counsels but those regs are not enforceable in court. https://t.co/mNG8aNsI2h

— Brit Hume (@brithume) May 6, 2018

Ref.: http://conservativefighters.org/news/full-transcript-of-muellers-court-beatdown-shows-how-bad-it-really-was-for-him-brit-hume-has-message-for-the-judge/

Mueller was illegally appointed to lead Russia probe: Gregg Jarrett

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett on how special counsel Robert Mueller was illegally appointed to lead the Russia investigation.

JW: Mueller Special Counsel REBUKED by Federal Judge

Today, a federal judge rebuked the Mueller special counsel over indictments relating to Paul Manafort, a Trump associate. Also–Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein botched the Mueller appointment by broadening the “scope” of the special counsel months after the appointment to justify targeting of Manafort on non-Russia charges. He would never have been charged but for his association with Trump.

Ad