Sweden’s election and how “Sverigedemokraterna” (SD) are being described as in the dishonest media

Image: From the party’s homepage

Sverigedemokraterna are called “far right.”

Ref.: https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&ei=wnuVW5P3JJHvrgSNg7KYDQ&q=Sweden%27s+election&oq=Sweden

Notice how the leftist “newspaper” The Guardian dominate the impartial Google search with their dishonest name calling / labelling?

Scrolling through the webpage of SD i was not able to find any typical “far-right” policies. In fact, the only thing they have written on their homepage i must say i find strange is the point about the environment.

Sems like they also have drunk the kool aid of the posinous “greens” about the (Man Made) Global Warming Bullshit.

“Sveriges utsläpp av växthusgaser är låga ..”

Meaning, Sweden’s emissions of “greenhouse gases” is low .. That is impressing when we consider the fact that such gases doesn’t exist in the real world.

If i am not mistaking, that is a typical leftist policy point (also supported by anyone getting kick-backs, individuals that are corrupt, that stand to get their pockets filled by illegal taxes on energy) etc.

Check it out for yourself …

There’s nothing scary or far right on that page, just common sense.

R. J. L.

Related

SWEDEN ELECTION EXIT POLL: Populist Sweden Democrats Surge Projected, Establishment Falters

Sweden

Jonathan Nackstrand/AFP/Getty Images

Exit polls for Sweden’s national elections project a surge in support for the populist Sweden Democrats, who may have won around a fifth of the vote.

By Jack Montgomery

Jimmie Åkesson’s eurosceptic, anti-mass migration party is forecast to take 19.2 percent of the vote in an exit poll for public broadcaster STV, while the ruling Prime Minister Stefan Löfven’s ruling Social Democrats losing significant ground and their Green Party partners only just breaking the 4 percent parliamentary threshold.

The Social Democrats’ establishment ‘centre-right’ rivals in the Moderate Party appear to have underwhelmed as well, with it looking likely that any mainstream minority coalition will have to cut deals with the Sweden Democrats — or each other — to legislate effectively.

A TV4’s exit poll estimates more modest gains for the Sweden Democrats, at 16.3 percent of the vote, but still makes uncomfortable reading for the establishment blocs, with the Social Democrats receiving their share of the vote since 1908 — as in the STV poll — and the Moderates also falling back to 18.4 percent, only slightly ahead of the populist upstarts.

Christian Christensen, an analyst from Stockholm University, has noted that exit polls for the previous election underestimated the Sweden Democrats’ share of the vote, and that pollsters’ claims to have adjusted their calculations this time around should be “taken with a grain of salt”.

“SD voters tend not to answer, even in exit polls,” he observed — possibly anticipating that the populist party will perform even better than expected once the votes are tallied and the true results revealed.

Ref.: https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/09/09/sweden-election-exit-poll-populist-sweden-democrats-surge-projected-establishment-falters/

Support

Newscats – on Patreon or Payoneer ID: 55968469

Cherry May Timbol – Independent Reporter
Contact Cherry at: cherrymtimbol@newscats.org or timbolcherrymay@gmail.com
Support Cherry May directly at: https://www.patreon.com/cherrymtimbol

Ad

Why do CO2 lag behind temperature?

71% of the earth is covered by ocean, water is a 1000 times denser than air and the mass of the oceans are 360 times that of the atmosphere, small temperature changes in the oceans doesn’t only modulate air temperature, but it also affect the CO2 level according to Henry’s Law.

The reason it is called “Law” is because it has been “proven”!

“.. scientific laws describe phenomena that the scientific community has found to be provably true ..”

That means, the graph proves CO2 do not control temperature, that again proves (Man Made) Global Warming, now called “Climate Change” due to lack of … Warming is – again – debunked!