Monkeypox gets a new name; vaccination requirements change

Some state healthcare personnel are becoming aware with alterations made to the vaccination dosages as they attempt to stem the spread of what they are now calling “m-pox,” also known as monkeypox.
Health officials claimed that they are splitting doses in a novel way. To deal with the scarcity, one dose of the vaccine can now protect up to five individuals.
Officials claim that the ‘intradermal’ dose is given in the front of the arm as opposed to the back.
The shots are tiny, but the doctors claim that even at one-fifth the amount, they are still just as effective.

According to Dr. Jennifer Tong of Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, “This was approved by the FDA based on a research that was done a few years ago in preparation for this very scenario—a hypothetical outbreak of monkeypox that would require dose sparing.” The immunological reaction was equally potent.
With San Francisco alone reporting more than 600 cases, the Bay Area is still a major hub for the illness.
State health officials confirmed on Friday that the illnesses are now referred to as m-pox or mpx.
Following a request by the World Health Organization for a new term to make the virus less derogatory and stigmatizing, it was changed.

RELATED: Why WHO Wants Monkeypox to Get a New Name

The World Health Organization states that, among other things, a disease name should not include an animal species.
A new name is being given to monkeypox.
The World Health Organization put out a call for suggestions from the general public on Friday in an effort to match the illness nomenclature with “best practices.”

Before WHO adopted its present system for naming viruses and diseases, the virus was first discovered in monkeys in a Danish laboratory in 1958, therefore earning the moniker “monkeypox.”
The World Health Organization stated in a press release that the current standard of care is to name newly discovered viruses, related diseases, and virus variants in order to avoid offending any cultural, social, national, regional, professional, or ethnic groups and to minimize any detrimental effects on trade, travel, tourism, or animal welfare.
The organization’s best standards state that a disease name shouldn’t contain references to places, populations, industries, or occupations, as well as names of peoples, animals, or food items.
Notably, there have been reports of assaults on monkeys in Brazil, prompting the WHO to issue a warning against hurting animals due to the illness.
At a press conference this week, WHO spokeswoman Margaret Harris stated, “What people need to know very clearly is that the transmission we are seeing is going between humans to humans.” “Close-contact transmission is used. Where it’s spreading among people and what people can do to prevent catching it and spreading it should be the main points of worry. Without a doubt, they shouldn’t be harming any animals.


By: Miss Cherry May Timbol – Independent Reporter

You can support my work directly on Patreon or Paypal
Contact by mail:
Contact by mail:


100% Data Tampering

What kind of a problem would need FAKE and manipulated documentation?

Look at all these “Climate Agreements.” We continue to lose money, prosperity and freedom while the CO2 level continue to increase, when do we say enough??