Taiwan invasion by China would fail, but at huge US cost, analysts’ war game finds

A US think tank used wargames to analyse China’s chances of taking Taiwan in a future invasion scenario. Photograph: Anonymous/AP

Military experts said every participant would experience ‘enormous’ losses in any potential conflict
A Chinese invasion of Taiwan would probably fail if the United States helped defend the island – but would come at a debilitating cost to the American military itself, according to a US thinktank.
Military experts brought together by the Center for Strategic and International Studies to war game the conflict said every likely direct participant in a war – the United States, China, Taiwan and Japan – would experience “enormous” losses.
Chinese missiles would probably destroy US airbases in Japan and as far as Guam, and sink two US aircraft carriers and between 10 and 20 destroyers and cruisers as the invasion opened.
But the Chinese invading force itself would be destroyed before it ever occupied any significant part of Taiwan and ultimately it would be prevented from its goal of capturing the island’s capital Taipei, according to most scenarios tested.
That, as well as damage incurred on mainland targets from Taiwanese counterattacks, could destabilise Chinese Communist party rule, the report says.
“We reached two conclusions,” said Eric Heginbotham, a security expert at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
“First, under most circumstances, China is unlikely to succeed in its operational objectives, or to occupy Taipei,” he said.
“Second, the cost of war would be high for all involved, certainly to include the United States.”
The wargaming tested 24 different scenarios focused on China attempting to seize the island by invasion in 2026. Crucial was the United States: without America’s help, Taiwan would be conquered by the People’s Liberation Army in three months or less.
The war game assumed the invasion would begin with an opening bombardment by China that destroys most of Taiwan’s navy and air force in a few hours. The Chinese navy would encircle Taiwan and begin ferrying a landing force of thousands of PLA soldiers and their equipment across the Taiwan Strait.
In what the war gamers called the most likely scenario, Taiwan’s army would bog the invaders down on the coast.
“Meanwhile US submarines, bombers, and fighter/attack aircraft, often reinforced by Japan Self-Defense Forces, rapidly cripple the Chinese amphibious fleet,” the report said.
“China’s strikes on Japanese bases and US surface ships cannot change the result: Taiwan remains autonomous,” it said.
Matthew Cancian of the US Naval War College said there were crucial variables on which that success depends.
First, he said, Taiwan itself must be determined to fight back.
Secondly, Japan must give its permission for the United States to launch counterattacks from its bases on Japanese territory.
Without that, Cancian said, “then the US intervention would not be enough to continue Taiwan’s autonomy.”
In such cases the human losses would be high, some 10,000 in the first weeks of the war. The war game raised important unknowns, such as whether the United States would risk nuclear war by attacking China directly.
It also asked if the US and Japanese public would be prepared to accept the losses that came with defending Taiwan, saying US losses could damage Washington’s ability to project global power for a very long time.
“The United States might win a pyrrhic victory, suffering more in the long run than the ‘defeated’ Chinese,” the report said.
The report said both Taiwan and the US military need to build up forces, focusing on the most survivable and effective weapons, to create more deterrence to a Chinese invasion.
“Despite rhetoric about adopting a ‘porcupine strategy,’ Taiwan still spends most of its defense budget on expensive ships and aircraft that China will quickly destroy,” it said.


By: Miss Cherry May Timbol – Independent Reporter

You can support my work directly on Patreon
Contact by mail: cherrymtimbol@newscats.org
Contact by mail: timbolcherrymay@gmail.com


100% Data Tampering

What kind of a problem would need FAKE and manipulated documentation?

Look at all these “Climate Agreements.” We continue to lose money, prosperity and freedom while the CO2 level continue to increase, when do we say enough??