No Climate Emergency say 500 Scientists to UN (Over 31 000 Total!)

Image: 1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarmism (from 2014)

Related: ‘Consensus’? 200+ New 2019 Papers Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarmism

Realted: Daring Italian scientists buck the AGW trend (90 Scientists)

Video: Friends of Science 

On the same day that Greta Thunberg made an impassioned speech to the UN about her fears of a climate emergency, some 500 scientists sent a registered letter to the UN Secretary-General stating that there is no climate emergency and climate policies should be designed to benefit the lives of people.

 

There’s a few of these petitions out there, the biggest one is “The Global Warming Petition Project” with over 31 000 signatures which is empirical evidence that there’s no such thing as a “consensus.” Another thing to notice about the petition, the “greens” has spent a lot of resources, time and money – to discredit and to smear it. Would you have done that if it was fake?

From their website:

Purpose of Petition

The purpose of the Petition Project is to demonstrate that the claim of “settled science” and an overwhelming “consensus” in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and consequent climatological damage is wrong. No such consensus or settled science exists. As indicated by the petition text and signatory list, a very large number of American scientists reject this hypothesis.

Publicists at the United Nations, Mr. Al Gore, and their supporters frequently claim that only a few “skeptics” remain – skeptics who are still unconvinced about the existence of a catastrophic human-caused global warming emergency.

It is evident that 31,487 Americans with university degrees in science – including 9,029 PhDs, are not “a few.” Moreover, from the clear and strong petition statement that they have signed, it is evident that these 31,487 American scientists are not “skeptics.”

These scientists are instead convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counterproductively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth.

Ref.: http://petitionproject.org/index.php

Consensus? 500+ Scientific Papers Published In 2018 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm

Analysis: 400 Scientific Papers Published In 2017 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm

More …

Hiding The Hottest Month On Record

By Tony Heller

NASA temperature records used to show March, 1878 as the hottest month on record around the world. There was a global heatwave and drought which killed fifty million people that year. NASA has since made the heat of 1878 disappear, and removed all of the hot weather prior to 1880. And the Australian Bureau of Meteorology has done even worse.

 

 

Ad