Study Finds The CO2 Greenhouse Effect Is Real…But Dangerous Global Warming From Rising CO2 Is Not

Image: The UN Wants Schools To Spread Climate Propaganda

The study below claim to finally prove the “Greenhouse Effect” …

They write in their introduction: “.. Direct measurements at the atmosphere are too strongly affected by convection, turbulence or scattering effects ..”?? (My Bold)

The set up ..

“Fig. 1 displays the experimental set-up that has proven particularly useful for our further investigations. Different to other experiments we use two plates in a closed housing ..”

That is all you need to know. They did not prove the “Greenhouse Effect”! The atmosphere is not a “closed housing” – the atmosphere is without walls!

Besides, that is the wrong way to do it. You have a theory, a hypothesis that say there’s a “Greenhouse Effect” – If you by experiments can’t disprove the hypothesis, the theory gets stronger and at some point it will become “a law.”

First step is to formulate a hypothesis, then a way to disprove the hypothesis. No surprise, that has never been done and all available proxy data, geological data, historical data and direct empirical measurements in the real world all tells us, there’s No “Greenhouse Effect” – No “Greenhouse Gases”!

R. J. L.
Via No Trick Zone – By Kenneth Richard

German physicists claim to have experimentally demonstrated the greenhouse effect from greenhouse gases like CO2 and CH4 is a real phenomenon, but assess the climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 with feedbacks is “only ECS = 0.7°C … 5.4x lower than the mean value of CMIP6 with ECS = 3.78°C.”
“The derived forcing for CO2 is in quite good agreement with some theoretical studies in the literature, which to some degree is the result of calibrating the set-up to the spectral calculations, but independently it determines and also reproduces the whole progression as a function of the gas concentration. From this we deduce a basic equilibrium climate sensitivity (without feedbacks) of ECSB = 1.05°C. When additionally assuming a reduced wing absorption of the spectral lines due to a finite collision time of the molecules this further reduces the ECSB by 10% and, thus, is 20% smaller than recommended by CMIP6 with 1.22°C.”

Detailed own investigations also show that in contrast to the assumptions of the IPCC water vapor only contributes to a marginal positive feedback and evaporation at the earth’s surface even leads to a significant further reduction of the climate sensitivity to only ECS = 0.7°C (Harde 2017 [15]). This is less than a quarter of the IPCC’s last specification with 3°C (see AR6 [1]) and even 5.4x lower than the mean value of CMIP6 with ECS = 3.78°C.”
“The presented measurements and calculations clearly confirm the existence of an atmospheric GHE, but they also demonstrate the only small impact on global warming, which apparently is much more dominated by natural impacts like solar radiative forcing (see, e.g., Connolly et al. 2021 [16]; Harde 2022 [17]). Therefore, it is high time to stop a further indoctrination of our society with one-sided information, fake experiments, videos or reports, only to generate panic.”
Full article ..


Newscats – on Patreon or Payoneer ID: 55968469

Cherry May Timbol – Independent Reporter
Contact Cherry at: or
Support Cherry May directly at:


Why do CO2 lag behind temperature?

71% of the earth is covered by ocean, water is a 1000 times denser than air and the mass of the oceans are 360 times that of the atmosphere, small temperature changes in the oceans doesn’t only modulate air temperature, but it also affect the CO2 level according to Henry’s Law.

The reason it is called “Law” is because it has been “proven”!

“.. scientific laws describe phenomena that the scientific community has found to be provably true ..”

That means, the graph proves CO2 do not control temperature, that again proves (Man Made) Global Warming, now called “Climate Change” due to lack of … Warming is – again – debunked!