THE FINAL ELECTORAL COUNT IS IN (AND IT’S MORE BAD NEWS FOR HILLARY!)

December 20, 2016 Larsen News, Politics 0

Voting has commenced and the 2016 election is set in stone.

 Here’s how it all went down:

The final count: (Donald Trump needed 270 to win):

TRUMP 304

Clinton 227

Colin Powell 3

Bernie Sanders 1

John Kasich 1

Ron Paul 1

Faith Spotted Eagle 1

Hillary Clinton has the largest amount of electoral defectors of any candidate in 100 years.

Ref.: http://truthfeed.com/the-final-electoral-count-is-in-and-its-more-bad-news-for-hillary/42624/

 

Support

Newscats – on Patreon or Payoneer ID: 55968469

Cherry May Timbol – Independent Reporter
Contact Cherry at: cherrymtimbol@newscats.org or timbolcherrymay@gmail.com
Support Cherry May directly at: https://www.patreon.com/cherrymtimbol

Ad

Why do CO2 lag behind temperature?

71% of the earth is covered by ocean, water is a 1000 times denser than air and the mass of the oceans are 360 times that of the atmosphere, small temperature changes in the oceans doesn’t only modulate air temperature, but it also affect the CO2 level according to Henry’s Law.

The reason it is called “Law” is because it has been “proven”!

“.. scientific laws describe phenomena that the scientific community has found to be provably true ..”

That means, the graph proves CO2 do not control temperature, that again proves (Man Made) Global Warming, now called “Climate Change” due to lack of … Warming is – again – debunked!

100% Data Tampering

Climate Science

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
Tom Shula: A Novel Perspective on the Greenhouse Effect | Tom Nelson Pod #98
Earth’s Thermodynamic Energy Budget
U.S. National Academies Find Greenhouse Effect Doesn’t Exist
Derivation of the effective radiating height & entire 33°C greenhouse effect without radiative forcing from greenhouse gases
You Only Need To Understand 1 Thing About The (Man Made) Global Warming, Now Called “Climate Change” Due To Lack Of … Warming Nonsense
Why The Claimed “97% Consensus” Is Meaningless

What kind of a problem would need FAKE and manipulated documentation?

Look at all these “Climate Agreements.” We continue to lose money, prosperity and freedom while the CO2 level continue to increase, when do we say enough??