Image: ‘Train Your Brain’ on Climate Change? (debate, don’t assume)
Related: Untampered Japan Meteorological Agency Data Show Tokyo Autumn Hasn’t Warmed In Decades
The “Exxon Knew” nonsense is used as a tool to avoid having to discuss the science, deal with arguments, and to convince more ignorant people that there’s nothing in the climate deniers arguments (that they are just being deishonest), that you don’t need to listen to them, proving they do not like to spend time on the science, the facts and empirical measurement and data. Why would that be a problem if there’s a real climate problem we could do something about??
The #ClimateFRAUD was never about the climate, but power and money!
R. J. L.
Video: Tony Heller
Climate alarmists believe oil companies have been engaged in a 45 year long conspiracy to destroy the climate – in exchange for money. Climate alarmists also like to accuse others of being “conspiracy theorists”
Don’t get me wrong, hurricanes can be extremely powerful and dangerous, as we know. But there’s a limit to how big and strong they can get and that has to do with the size of the earth and the atmosphere. Alarmists are dishonest about and are exaggerating this issue – as everything else. Why would they do that if there’s a real problem? Why do real problems need FAKE data??:
- New Evidence Shows People Aren’t Under Greater Threat From Hurricanes
- No, NPR, Climate Change Isn’t ‘…Making the Weather More Severe,’ nor Should It Be in Daily Weather Forecasts
- Misery Guaranteed: Net Zero CO2 Emissions Targets Mean Taxing Prosperity Out of Existence
- Green Energy Cabal Blind to Africa’s Medical Horror Show
- Let the Excuses Flow: Aussie Federal Government Misses Emission Targets
- LIVE at NOON CST: ClimateTV – The #COP27 Failure
- Bill Maher Tells Teens Talking About Climate To ‘Shut The F*ck Up’ – ‘You’re using cars as much as we did’ – Praises private jets: ‘The only people who don’t like private are the ones who can’t’
Very sick people-hating Johns Hopkins bioethicist Travis Rieder:
“Any children we have in the developed parts of the world will be incredibly environmentally expensive. And they might go on to have kids who also consume more than their fair share.”https://t.co/cjlGnbXwhc
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) December 2, 2022
A few points for the dopey @hausfath:
1. Fossil fuels took humanity from <1 billion to > 8 billion — living longer than ever before.
2. No scientific evidence shows emissions are harming humanity or the planet.
3. There is no reason to move, or pathway from fossil fuels. 3/ pic.twitter.com/KZR3axbePZ
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) December 2, 2022
