Would there be a 9/11 attack on the US without Bill Clinton in the White House?

Former President Bill Clinton talks to voters about Hillary Clinton in Concord, N.H., on Wedneday, Jan. 20, 2016. (Carolyn Cole/Los Angeles Times/TNS)

Bill Clinton was president from 1993-2001. We know he NAFTA the economy, put in place the foundation for the Housing Bubble and it was under his watch the weak national security policy slowly crept in by for example not reacting to Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda attack on the USS Cole, 12 October 2000. As history has shown, when the West isn’t paying attention, the terrorists gets more bold. Vigilance, intelligence and national security doesn’t seem to be on the radar screen to Democrats. “Hug it out” approach to terrorists has proven not to work, and now the US are risking electing a candidate that is even more pro-Islamic than President Obama.


So, would there be a 9/11 attack on the US without Bill Clinton in the White House? We’ll never know .. But would you let him in again in order to find out exactly how the correlation is?

While America Slept: The True Story of 9/11


Newscats – on Patreon or Payoneer ID: 55968469

Cherry May Timbol – Independent Reporter
Contact Cherry at: cherrymtimbol@newscats.org or timbolcherrymay@gmail.com
Support Cherry May directly at: https://www.patreon.com/cherrymtimbol


Why do CO2 lag behind temperature?

71% of the earth is covered by ocean, water is a 1000 times denser than air and the mass of the oceans are 360 times that of the atmosphere, small temperature changes in the oceans doesn’t only modulate air temperature, but it also affect the CO2 level according to Henry’s Law.

The reason it is called “Law” is because it has been “proven”!

“.. scientific laws describe phenomena that the scientific community has found to be provably true ..”

That means, the graph proves CO2 do not control temperature, that again proves (Man Made) Global Warming, now called “Climate Change” due to lack of … Warming is – again – debunked!